Saturday, February 26, 2011
Sunday, February 20, 2011
Blood Clots In Urine Before Period
See you soon ...
Over the next few weeks, I would travel professional ...
Thus, I would continue to post messages, but they are scheduled and published automatically ... So, obviously a little less work than last published ...
soon! 
Over the next few weeks, I would travel professional ... Thus, I would continue to post messages, but they are scheduled and published automatically ... So, obviously a little less work than last published ...
soon!
Pregnant Deductible Twice
On the deck of a British hospital ship in 1914
Someone would he recognize this boat docked in a port unknown? 
 |
| The European war of 1914: a corner of the deck of a British hospital ship . collection agency Adhemar |
Sunday, February 13, 2011
Traveling To China With A Camera
Baby-drug
Selected excerpts from an article read this week on a news site:
'First' designer baby 'born in France, a "double hope" for his parents the first "designer baby" in France, which will treat one of his elders for which it is a compatible donor, has born in hospital in Clamart Antoine Beclere, announced on Monday AFP professors René Frydman and Arnold Munnich.
Experts call for "double hope baby" because the methods used to arrive at his birth parents to offer both hope to have a child who does not suffer from a serious illness as his elders and will also to treat one of them.
The little boy was born by in vitro fertilization after a double preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the selection of embryos.
There have been births of "baby doctors" in the world, but this is the first time in France. The United States started there ten years, and few births were reported more recently in Europe, Belgium (both first announced by the University Hospital AZ-VUB, near Brussels in 2005) and Spain (a birth in 2008). "
If we can not only rejoice at this news, a birth is always a fabulous event, and the prospect of healing a child with absolutely no price, it should however be cautious. Indeed, if today is the eldest healed, and the younger healthy, how the two brothers psychologically evolve in the future? One knowing he owes his health to the next, and the youngest knowing that his life should probably only the first disease?
And in the future, why not consider going further, why not taking a piece of an organ regenerating naturally (like the liver) rather than cells from the umbilical cord as was the case here?
Attention to risk of slippage as the liver, why not pass a kidney (we live very well with one kidney), and after?
The slope is slippery!
And if we're still the good side of the line, be careful not to let slip the other side ...
Another aspect of the problem seems to me to be the selection of the embryo.
Today, we choose a child that is free of known genetic disease, and donor. Technically, What will prevent parents from tomorrow to choose the sex, hair color, eyes, size, ... The technology exists, the method has already been applied, it even has a cute name: Eugenics ...
As stated above, if we're still the good side of the line, the slope is slippery ...
And the deep abyss ...
Selected excerpts from an article read this week on a news site: 'First' designer baby 'born in France, a "double hope" for his parents the first "designer baby" in France, which will treat one of his elders for which it is a compatible donor, has born in hospital in Clamart Antoine Beclere, announced on Monday AFP professors René Frydman and Arnold Munnich.
Experts call for "double hope baby" because the methods used to arrive at his birth parents to offer both hope to have a child who does not suffer from a serious illness as his elders and will also to treat one of them.
The little boy was born by in vitro fertilization after a double preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for the selection of embryos. 
There have been births of "baby doctors" in the world, but this is the first time in France. The United States started there ten years, and few births were reported more recently in Europe, Belgium (both first announced by the University Hospital AZ-VUB, near Brussels in 2005) and Spain (a birth in 2008). "
If we can not only rejoice at this news, a birth is always a fabulous event, and the prospect of healing a child with absolutely no price, it should however be cautious. Indeed, if today is the eldest healed, and the younger healthy, how the two brothers psychologically evolve in the future? One knowing he owes his health to the next, and the youngest knowing that his life should probably only the first disease?
And in the future, why not consider going further, why not taking a piece of an organ regenerating naturally (like the liver) rather than cells from the umbilical cord as was the case here?
Attention to risk of slippage as the liver, why not pass a kidney (we live very well with one kidney), and after?
The slope is slippery!
And if we're still the good side of the line, be careful not to let slip the other side ...
Another aspect of the problem seems to me to be the selection of the embryo.
Today, we choose a child that is free of known genetic disease, and donor. Technically, What will prevent parents from tomorrow to choose the sex, hair color, eyes, size, ... The technology exists, the method has already been applied, it even has a cute name: Eugenics ...
As stated above, if we're still the good side of the line, the slope is slippery ...
And the deep abyss ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)